According to section 26 of the law, a minor can draw, support and negotiate and, except himself, can attach it to anyone. By law, anyone who is in a contractual position can engage and be bound by the creation, design, acceptance, delivery and negotiation of a cheque, debt or change. From the outset, a minor`s contract was not concluded because he does not have the vision, knowledge and skills to enter into a legally binding contract. Unless necessary, learned and guardianship agreement, the consent of minors is a dead letter and has no influence on the parties. A minor may be admitted to the benefits of the contract, but cannot bear any debts. Since an agreement becomes compliant with the contract only with the free consent of the parties concerned, which is legally applicable,[19] an agreement with the „incompetent“ minor becomes denied or invalidated. A miner can draw, support, negotiate and provide instruments and can hire everyone but himself. [16] This protects the minor from liability for him. Thus, minors, unhealthy people and those disqualified by law are incapacitated from work. the age of majority is 18, but where a guardian is appointed, it is 21. Under Section 30 of the Indian Partnership Act of 1932, a minor cannot be a partner, but can be included in the benefits of the partnership.

When a minor who is incompetent for a contractual relationship and is taken care of by another necessity of life is compensated by the person who made the needs available to the minor, he may be compensated by the property of the minor. A minor cannot be bound if he has no quality. 2) The property of a minor is responsible for Dener: when a minor is supplied by someone with food, medicine, clothing and other necessities, the person who provided such needs is entitled to reimbursement of that person`s property. It is now well established that there is no Estoppel against the minor, even if he acted fraudulently. The minor is not against a law that has cancelled a minor`s contract. 6) The rule of Estoppel: Estoppel is a rule that can make responsible a party that has started to do something before entering into a contract as part of the reflection .. This rule cannot apply to minors. The agreement of a minor is a series of promises or a contractual agreement in which a party exists as a minor. Minor is considered incompetent to be tolerated under the Indian Contract Act of 1872.

This is because minors are not mature enough to be responsible for legal affairs. A contract agreement must be legally applicable. Therefore, one of the essential elements of a valid contract mentioned in the Indian Contract Act of 1872 is that the contracting parties should be responsible for the performance of the contract. The following contract persons are in compliance with the contract: Under Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act of 1972, not all contracts are contracts. Only these agreements are contracts entered into by the parties responsible for concluding the contract. In addition, the word „competent“ is described in Section 11 of the Contracts Act in India. Sections 10 and 11 of the Indian Contract Act show that a person who, because of his childhood, is unable to enter into a contract within the meaning of the Indian Contract Act. Therefore, the agreement of a minor is null and void from the outset and cannot be applied by any of the contracting parties.

As a general rule, the nullity of a minor should be completely free of any effect (unless the contract benefits a minor).